In 2002, Hunter, then 43 years old, was convicted of sexual assault in Jefferson County, Colorado. Today, at 64, he continues to maintain his innocence, despite spending more than two decades behind bars. His case has resurfaced in the public eye due to a federal lawsuit challenging the integrity of the evidence that led to his conviction—evidence analyzed by Yvonne “Missy” Woods, a forensic scientist whose work is now under intense scrutiny.
The Evidence That Sealed Hunter’s Fate
At the center of Hunter’s conviction was a hair follicle presented as DNA evidence. Woods, the lead scientist from the Colorado Bureau of Investigation (CBI) at the time, testified that the hair matched Hunter’s DNA, placing him at the crime scene. However, questions about the validity of Woods’ work have since emerged, casting doubt on the entire foundation of Hunter’s conviction.
The lawsuit filed on Hunter’s behalf alleges that Woods incorrectly identified the victim’s hair as Hunter’s, a claim supported by recent findings of anomalies in Woods’ work. Ten months after the crime, new evidence surfaced, but the prosecution’s case hinged on the hair follicle analysis conducted by Woods.
A Systemic Problem: Woods’ Misconduct
Missy Woods’ career as a forensic scientist spanned nearly three decades. During this time, she worked on over 1,000 cases, many of which relied heavily on her DNA analyses to secure convictions. However, an investigation into her work has revealed systemic issues, including data manipulation, improper protocols, and a lack of oversight.
The Colorado Bureau of Investigation recently acknowledged these problems, stating that anomalies in Woods’ work have invalidated previous findings. A criminal investigation into her conduct is ongoing, and no charges have been filed against her as of yet. Nonetheless, the impact of her actions is undeniable, with at least five district attorneys’ offices identifying cases affected by her work.
Implications for Justice
Hunter’s federal lawsuit is demanding that all biological evidence in his case be handed over for retesting. The goal is to determine the accuracy of Woods’ findings and, potentially, exonerate Hunter. “This discovery gives us added weight to our argument in federal court,” said Britton, Hunter’s attorney, referring to the recent investigation into Woods’ misconduct.
Beyond Hunter’s case, the implications are far-reaching. How many other individuals are imprisoned based on flawed evidence? This question looms large as the CBI compiles a list of cases involving Woods. The sheer volume of cases—over 1,000—raises concerns about the integrity of convictions statewide.
A Broader Crisis in Forensic Science
The revelations about Woods are part of a larger crisis in forensic science, where systemic vulnerabilities and lack of oversight can lead to catastrophic consequences. Reports indicate that Woods’ questionable practices date back to at least 2014, with colleagues noting her tendency to “cut corners” and delete historical data. Despite these red flags, Woods continued to work on critical cases.
Missy Woods Investigation: A Legacy of Misconduct Rocks the Colorado Bureau of Investigation
The Colorado Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has concluded its exhaustive review into the career of Yvonne “Missy” Woods, a former DNA analyst accused of manipulating data over her nearly 30-year tenure. The findings are both shocking and deeply troubling: 1,003 cases have been identified as impacted by Woods’ misconduct.
Decades of Deception
The investigation, initiated in October 2023, uncovered deliberate and systematic manipulation of data by Woods. Notably, she purposefully deleted critical data, undermining the integrity of forensic evidence in numerous cases. Before the internal affairs investigation could be completed, Woods retired, leaving behind a trail of compromised cases. Despite her retirement, she remains under criminal investigation.
The CBI’s recent update, published on its official website on December 17, 2024, confirmed the completion of the comprehensive review. The agency stated that any new information related to Woods’ misconduct would be “thoroughly vetted.” However, many are questioning the adequacy of this response, given the scale of the revelations.
The Numbers Speak Volumes
Originally, the review identified approximately 600 cases impacted by Woods’ actions. This number has since grown to over 1,000, raising concerns about the true extent of the damage. Critics argue that every case she touched must be retested, re-questioned, and reevaluated to ensure justice is served. Yet, Woods remains free, and her whereabouts are unknown to the public.
A Systemic Failure
The revelations have sparked outrage and calls for accountability. Many are demanding answers as to why Woods has not been charged or detained despite the severity of her actions. “If this were any other criminal, they would already be imprisoned,” one critic noted.
Agencies are also being criticized for their delayed response. Jefferson County, in particular, has faced scrutiny for its inaction, with questions arising about why it took so long to prosecute someone whose actions have jeopardized countless lives and convictions.
The Broader Implications
The misconduct of a single forensic scientist has shaken confidence in the justice system. For victims, defendants, and their families, the revelations represent a betrayal of trust. Woods’ actions not only undermined the credibility of forensic science but also tainted the work of honest professionals dedicated to seeking the truth.
Where is Missy Woods?
As the criminal investigation into Woods continues, many are questioning why she remains at large. There is growing frustration that her retirement has shielded her from immediate accountability. Some fear that public anger may lead to individuals taking matters into their own hands if authorities fail to act swiftly.
What Happens Next?
The CBI has pledged to “thoroughly vet” any new evidence that comes to light, but for many, this promise falls short. Advocacy groups and legal experts are urging a comprehensive audit of all cases she worked on and calling for transparency from the CBI and other agencies involved. Meanwhile, the criminal investigation into Woods is ongoing, leaving many to wonder if justice will ever truly be served.
This scandal underscores the need for rigorous oversight in forensic science and highlights systemic vulnerabilities that must be addressed to restore faith in the criminal justice system. The fallout from Woods’ actions will undoubtedly continue to unfold, but for now, one question looms large: Where is Missy Woods, and when will she be held accountable?
New Legislation Seeks Justice for Defendants Impacted by Colorado Bureau of Investigation Scandal
Colorado’s legal system is grappling with the fallout of a scandal that has called into question the integrity of forensic evidence used to convict hundreds of defendants over the past three decades. At the center of the controversy is Yvonne “Missy” Woods, a former forensic scientist with the Colorado Bureau of Investigation (CBI), accused of manipulating, skipping, and even deleting crucial steps in DNA testing. Her misconduct has triggered a crisis of confidence in the state’s judicial process, leading lawmakers to introduce unprecedented legislation aimed at rectifying the damage.
The Scandal Unfolds
An internal CBI investigation uncovered over 800 anomalies in Woods’ DNA analyses. Defense attorneys believe the true number could be much higher, potentially impacting convictions across the state. Evidence mishandling has already caused ripple effects in the justice system, with some sentences being reduced and convictions overturned.
High-profile cases such as Garrett Coughlin’s, where a life sentence for triple homicide was reduced due to unreliable DNA evidence, and James Herman Dye’s release after retested DNA excluded him as a suspect, highlight the profound implications of the scandal.
Yet, there are cases like that of Michael Clark, which cast a more complex shadow. Clark, convicted of a 1994 murder, is challenging his sentence based on flawed DNA evidence, but critics argue that the new evidence doesn’t absolve him of guilt.
Conversely, cases like David Hehn’s—a cold case involving the murder of a young woman—are rallying cries for justice. Advocates argue that Hehn, convicted on questionable microscopic evidence, represents the kind of wrongful conviction that demands immediate reform.
Legislative Response
The proposed legislation seeks to:
- Ensure Transparency: Mandate that CBI notify all defendants whose cases might have been impacted by Woods’ misconduct.
- Provide Legal Support: Guarantee access to post-conviction legal counsel for affected defendants.
- Apply Retroactively: Address cases dating back decades while setting standards for future forensic accountability.
Governor Jared Polis has also signed an executive order establishing a 14-member oversight committee. The committee includes representatives from law enforcement, defense attorneys, and forensic experts to review CBI practices.
However, critics argue that the committee lacks independence. “It’s just another example of the fox guarding the henhouse,” says Mary Claire Mulligan, a Boulder criminal defense attorney. “This does nothing to address the systemic failures or rebuild trust.”
Accountability or Bureaucratic Chaos?
The scandal has ignited debate about broader accountability within the criminal justice system. The public defender’s office, tasked with representing defendants, has faced criticism for its role—or lack thereof—in preventing these wrongful convictions.
“Public defenders failed these men and women during trial,” said Adam Frank, a post-conviction defense attorney. “They should have demanded second opinions or called independent forensic experts when the evidence was questionable. Now, those affected must wait years for potential remedies.”
This sentiment underscores the frustration of many advocacy groups and defense attorneys who believe the system prioritizes damage control over meaningful reform.
Moving Forward
Despite skepticism, the legislation represents a critical first step toward rectifying decades of potential injustice. Advocates hope it will not only bring relief to those wrongfully convicted but also set a precedent for transparency and accountability in forensic science.
“The fallout from this scandal isn’t just about the individuals affected; it’s about the integrity of the justice system itself,” said Frank. “This legislation isn’t a cure-all, but it’s a start. What’s needed now is sustained pressure to ensure systemic change.”
For Colorado, the scandal involving Missy Woods and the CBI is a harsh reminder of the fallibility of forensic science and the human cost of its misuse. The path forward requires more than legislation—it demands a cultural shift in how justice is pursued and delivered.
Calls for Reform
Watchdog groups such as the ACLU of Colorado and the Kory Wise Innocence Project have called for greater accountability and transparency in forensic practices. They argue that the CBI’s failure to comply with federally mandated oversight requirements contributed to the scale of Woods’ misconduct.
CBI Director Chris Schaefer has pledged to restore trust in the agency’s forensic processes. “We are meticulously reviewing all testing protocols and auditing the results of both current and past DNA scientists to ensure the integrity of our laboratory,” Schaefer stated.
Seeking Justice
1003 cases exemplify the fragility of justice when flawed evidence is allowed to dictate outcomes. The fight for exoneration is not just a personal battle but a testament to the need for systemic reform in forensic science and the criminal justice system as a whole.
As the investigation into Missy Woods continues, it remains to be seen how many convictions will need to be revisited. For 1003 cases and countless others, the hope is that the truth will finally come to light, proving that justice delayed does not have to mean justice denied.
Justice Unlocked. 
Leave a comment